Posted by: thegoodcounsel | May 22, 2013

Guest Post – To CGA or Not CGA, That is the Question

images A posting by Bob Cohen, Tamar Fink Agency

In the current and projected environment of rapidly improving healthcare, many nonprofits are viewing certain Charitable Gift Annuities as a liability rather than as an opportunity. The legal and contractual obligation pay a fixed rate / sum of money to a donor over his / her / their lifetime, has understandably made many organizations (and their boards), extremely nervous.

In many cases, the very gifting technique that has been around for decades and has helped build many nonprofit organizations, is now threatening those same organizations based on a commitment made prior to such increased life expectancies.

Read More…

Posted by: thegoodcounsel | May 15, 2013

The Effective Development Program; Ten Essentials for Success

YAegGCLhvo0aJugTGHimYcWBFvZBeakoqI8_Avwh8p8-1 A Post from James V. Toscano

There are many factors spelling success for development programs at nonprofits. Development here means the larger, always increasing building of constituency, reinforcing brand, motivating volunteers,  inspiring donors and increasing fundraising totals.

Ten of these factors appear essential, are measurable and, thus, may be continuously improved.

Here are the ten:

1.  The essential agreement among Board members, executive directors and development directors on their respective roles in the development process. While this may vary from organization to organization, the elements of Board participation, executive director leadership and development director management of the process must all be present.

Read More…

Posted by: thegoodcounsel | April 29, 2013

Ten Requisites to Retain Development Directors

YAegGCLhvo0aJugTGHimYcWBFvZBeakoqI8_Avwh8p8-1 A Post from James V. Toscano

Since the release of the Underdeveloped Study, much has been written here and elsewhere about the state of development and fundraising offices and people in nonprofit organizations.

We have been somewhat shocked by what we read in the report on short tenures, distrust, misunderstanding, and intentions to terminate and to leave. All in all, the report gives a picture of a disaster happening before our eyes.

We know there are many places where this is not happening, yet we also know a number of nonprofits where elements of this picture are present, some in abundance.

Two previous pieces on what Boards and candidates should do in the hiring process have appeared here and here, but what about those already on board? How do we both energize development directors and how do we retain the successful ones over a longer period of time? There are ways to correct what I call the “profound misunderstanding.” Read More…

Posted by: thegoodcounsel | April 16, 2013

The Ten Requisites for Conducting a Capital Campaign

YAegGCLhvo0aJugTGHimYcWBFvZBeakoqI8_Avwh8p8-1 A Posting by James V. Toscano

Capital Campaigns, which, for purposes here, include endowment as well, used to be a once-in-a-lifetime event. One could expect one’s religious institution, alma mater, cultural center and favorite charity to solicit a capital donation once.

Now, there’s a certain circularity cycling capital campaigns every x years.

An institution of higher education near to my home has just gone over its $500M goal and is celebrating. It is simultaneously planning its next campaign, perhaps in five to seven years. Read More…

Posted by: thegoodcounsel | April 8, 2013

Charity Navigator Meets Reality

YAegGCLhvo0aJugTGHimYcWBFvZBeakoqI8_Avwh8p8-1 A Post from James V. Toscano

Notwithstanding self-promotion, “Charity Navigator is American’s largest and most influential charity rater” and self-aggrandizement, “the largest and most utilized charity rating service that exists anywhere,” the New Jersey-based Charity Navigator is realizing the incredible complexity of its task.

At first, they presented themselves as charity raters, although they based their rating stars (1-4, with 4 best) only on financial variables. They gradually became more sophisticated on this dimension through critical feedback and through their experience in examinations of large charities with at least $500K in public support and $1M in overall budget.

By elimination of the vast number of small charities, and by requiring at least 4 years of 990 reporting, CN chose to focus on the largest charities, the top 1-2%, with a goal of evaluating 10,000 of the million or so out there. How useful this is has been the subject of an interesting, sometimes heated debate.  Read More…

Posted by: thegoodcounsel | April 1, 2013

Ten Insights into Fundraising Among Boomers and Elders

YAegGCLhvo0aJugTGHimYcWBFvZBeakoqI8_Avwh8p8-1 A Post from James V. Toscano

As a person born before 1946, I am part of that group referred to as the “lost,” “quiet” and some of us, “greatest” generation. Marketers often call us “seniors” or “elders.” Given the great American Indian tradition of respect for elders, I prefer that term and will use it throughout.

The Boomers, born between 1946 and 1964, subject of a mountain of studies and opinion pieces, are now coming into their own. They’re the richest generation ever, thought to have over $40 trillion to leave to the next generation. They, with my generation, make up most of the donors, major donors, lead trust donors, lead gift donors and planned gift donors to nonprofit organizations. Read More…

Posted by: thegoodcounsel | March 19, 2013

Ten Questions to Ask a Director of Development Candidate

cropped-zhsq2j1kxf6lazfpr2kuahpd4pv3bm-dsopucgjfvk-1.jpeg A posting by Dania Toscano Miwa and James V. Toscano

We read in the recent report, UnderDeveloped, of significant problems in recruiting and retaining good development people and that average tenure now is often at two years or less. Moreover, all is not well in many relationships between Executive Directors (ED) and Development Directors (DD).

In an effort to promote transparency and clear up what is thought of as the “profound misunderstanding” about roles between and among the Board, ED and DD in an institution’s development program, we submit the following initial questions to recruitment and screening committees of nonprofits interviewing candidates for the DD position. Read More…

Posted by: thegoodcounsel | March 11, 2013

The Two Nonprofit Sectors

YAegGCLhvo0aJugTGHimYcWBFvZBeakoqI8_Avwh8p8-1 A post from James V. Toscano

In his post, Minnesota Council of Nonprofits’ Jon Pratt discussed “A Virtuous Cycle” referring to the recent UnderDeveloped study. He reported difficulties of smaller nonprofits in affording needed development and related infrastructure costs.

The idea of a virtuous cycle for nonprofit organizations able to afford infrastructure and transaction costs provokes discussion on the haves and have-nots among us.

A recent study helps. In the March 2012 Stanford Social Innovation Review article, “ Why More Nonprofits Are Getting Bigger,” authors Peter Kim and Jeffrey Bradach reported on the emergence of a new wave of large organizations, e.g. Teach for America, Habitat, Komen, joining the long-established United Ways, Boys & Girls Clubs and Goodwill crowd. Read More…

Posted by: thegoodcounsel | March 5, 2013

Guest Post – A Virtuous Cycle

jon-prattA post by Jon Pratt

To paraphrase St. Paul, Minnesota native F. Scott Fitzgerald, “Let me tell you about rich nonprofits. They are different from you and me.”

Underdeveloped — A National Study of Challenges Facing Nonprofit Fundraising identifies several ongoing, and challenging facts of life for the development staffing of the nonprofit sector, particularly for small organizations. Clearly these factors makes it more difficult for organizations to gather consistent or adequate resources – what we don’t know is what improvements or declines have occurred over the last 15 years, but I suspect that little is different. Read More…

Posted by: thegoodcounsel | February 26, 2013

Guest Post – Functionality Plus Fit Equals Better Fund Raising

DMFcurrentshot A Post by Dawn M. Fish, M.A., CFRE

Reading the recently released report, Underdeveloped: A National Study of Challenges Facing Nonprofit Fundraising by Jeanne Bell and Maria Cornelius, I reflected upon my 25 years as an executive, development director and gift officer raising funds in social service, health care and higher education institutions. The report contains no surprises, but did fail to address two major issues related to nonprofit fund-raising failures: the traits and skills necessary in an effective director of development (DOD) and the relationship between the executive director (ED) and the DOD.

DOD traits and skills

An effective DOD must possess a cadre of highly sought-after traits and skills, capably exercising them on a moment’s notice. The successful DOD must possess traits such as integrity, resilience, persistence, tact, diplomacy, humility, confidence, compassion, team compatibility, intuition, adaptability and flexibility, to name a few. Read More…

Older Posts »

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 639 other followers